There’s no such thing as an Entrepreneur
Recently Chris Dixon wrote an interesting post on the problems of pattern recognition. In it he writes:
If you look at the hugely successful startups of the last decade, the founders have many similarities that are easy to observe. When they started, many were male, young, unmarried, computer programmers, dropouts of elite universities, etc. As a result, a lot of investors look for founders with these characteristics. But without an understanding of the deeper reasons these founders succeeded, these observable characteristics could just as well be the color of the sky and not the tanks.
His main point is that investors might be developing wrong patterns for judging investments by focusing on simple observable traits such as age and sex. I don’t just agree with Chris, I actually want to take it one step further. There is no prototypical Entrepreneur.
Simply Googling for “characteristics of an entrepreneur” will give you a ton of articles, some scientific, some entertaining, of what characteristics you have to have in order to be an entrepreneur. And if you don’t have these characteristics you’re out of luck, you will forever be doomed to a life as a mindless peon.
Bullshit!
An entrepreneur is an entrepreneur because (s)he is an entrepreneur. To illustrate: a dancer is simply a dancer because he or she dances. If I get my ass out of my chair now and start jumping around the room to the latest Lady Gaga, I am a dancer. That’s all there is to it. The same with being an entrepreneur, there is no set of defining traits that separates the entrepreneur from the rest of the population, an entrepreneur is an entrepreneur because he or she acts entrepreneurial.



